<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (8) TMI 79 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441100</link>
    <description>The ITAT Hyderabad allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal for statistical purposes, directing a re-consideration of the Arms Length Price determination using the Resale Price Method for the distribution function. This decision was based on consistency with a previous decision in the assessee&#039;s case for the assessment year 2011-12, where the RPM was considered the Most Appropriate Method.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2023 09:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=721283" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (8) TMI 79 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441100</link>
      <description>The ITAT Hyderabad allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal for statistical purposes, directing a re-consideration of the Arms Length Price determination using the Resale Price Method for the distribution function. This decision was based on consistency with a previous decision in the assessee&#039;s case for the assessment year 2011-12, where the RPM was considered the Most Appropriate Method.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441100</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>