https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441089 The High Court dismissed the Second Appeal, affirming lower court decisions that the suit property was self-acquired by defendant No.2. The plaintiff failed to prove joint family property ownership or ancestral property purchase. Defendant No.2 lawfully possessed the property, and claims of illegal possession were unsubstantiated. The court ruled the Benami Transactions Act did not apply retroactively, clarifying its prospective application. The plaintiff's claims were not upheld, and the suit was not barred by limitation. en-us Fri, 14 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 01 Aug 2023 09:38:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441089 The High Court dismissed the Second Appeal, affirming lower court decisions that the suit property was self-acquired by defendant No.2. The plaintiff failed to prove joint family property ownership or ancestral property purchase. Defendant No.2 lawfully possessed the property, and claims of illegal possession were unsubstantiated. The court ruled the Benami Transactions Act did not apply retroactively, clarifying its prospective application. The plaintiff's claims were not upheld, and the suit was not barred by limitation. Case-Laws Benami Property Fri, 14 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441089