<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (8) TMI 66 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441087</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the importer&#039;s declared value of Zinc Scrap, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s challenge to the rejection of the declared value under Customs Valuation Rules. The Revenue failed to prove undervaluation, lacking evidence of comparable imports and failing to meet the burden of proof required to reject the transaction value. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the importer&#039;s declared value and providing relief in favor of the importer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2023 10:12:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=721270" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (8) TMI 66 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441087</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the importer&#039;s declared value of Zinc Scrap, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s challenge to the rejection of the declared value under Customs Valuation Rules. The Revenue failed to prove undervaluation, lacking evidence of comparable imports and failing to meet the burden of proof required to reject the transaction value. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the importer&#039;s declared value and providing relief in favor of the importer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441087</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>