<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (8) TMI 62 - NATIONAL FINANCIAL REPORTING AUTHORITY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441083</link>
    <description>Material deficiencies in the audit evidence, planning and documentation proved multiple breaches of core auditing standards. The engagement partner failed to obtain sufficient appropriate evidence on inventory, related party identification, and external confirmations for receivables and payables, and also failed to document an audit plan, determine materiality and performance materiality, communicate properly with those charged with governance, record non-compliance, document sampling methodology, or secure an engagement quality control review. These lapses were held to amount to gross negligence and lack of due diligence, satisfying the test for professional misconduct. Monetary penalty and two-year debarment from audit-related appointments were imposed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2023 11:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=721266" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (8) TMI 62 - NATIONAL FINANCIAL REPORTING AUTHORITY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441083</link>
      <description>Material deficiencies in the audit evidence, planning and documentation proved multiple breaches of core auditing standards. The engagement partner failed to obtain sufficient appropriate evidence on inventory, related party identification, and external confirmations for receivables and payables, and also failed to document an audit plan, determine materiality and performance materiality, communicate properly with those charged with governance, record non-compliance, document sampling methodology, or secure an engagement quality control review. These lapses were held to amount to gross negligence and lack of due diligence, satisfying the test for professional misconduct. Monetary penalty and two-year debarment from audit-related appointments were imposed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441083</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>