https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308923 A transfer or wakf set up to resist execution must be shown to be a genuine disposition that really divests the transferor of beneficial ownership. Here, the surrounding evidence showed that the alleged gift was not acted upon in substance: the donor continued to treat the property as his own and the claimed basis for the transfer was unproven. The wakf deed was likewise found to be a colourable arrangement, as the evidence indicated that ownership and control remained with the defendant and the later conveyance was taken in his own name. Both documents failed as bona fide divestitures and were ineffective against the judgment creditor. en-us Thu, 24 Jul 1930 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 01 Aug 2023 14:47:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308923 A transfer or wakf set up to resist execution must be shown to be a genuine disposition that really divests the transferor of beneficial ownership. Here, the surrounding evidence showed that the alleged gift was not acted upon in substance: the donor continued to treat the property as his own and the claimed basis for the transfer was unproven. The wakf deed was likewise found to be a colourable arrangement, as the evidence indicated that ownership and control remained with the defendant and the later conveyance was taken in his own name. Both documents failed as bona fide divestitures and were ineffective against the judgment creditor. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 24 Jul 1930 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308923