<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (8) TMI 41 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441062</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the assessment and addition under section 69A of the Act but ruled in favor of the assessee in penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c) of the Act. The penalty was deleted as relief granted based on peak credit theory showed no concealment of income or inaccurate particulars. The appeal was allowed, and the penalty was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2023 09:03:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=721184" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (8) TMI 41 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441062</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the assessment and addition under section 69A of the Act but ruled in favor of the assessee in penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c) of the Act. The penalty was deleted as relief granted based on peak credit theory showed no concealment of income or inaccurate particulars. The appeal was allowed, and the penalty was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441062</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>