<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (7) TMI 344 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33487</link>
    <description>A communication rejecting remission of duty for goods destroyed in transit was treated as an administrative decision and not as an appealable order. Because the remission request had not been decided after considering all relevant points and without giving the appellant an opportunity of hearing, the matter required fresh consideration. The dispute was therefore remitted to the Commissioner to pass a proper appealable order after hearing the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72118" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (7) TMI 344 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33487</link>
      <description>A communication rejecting remission of duty for goods destroyed in transit was treated as an administrative decision and not as an appealable order. Because the remission request had not been decided after considering all relevant points and without giving the appellant an opportunity of hearing, the matter required fresh consideration. The dispute was therefore remitted to the Commissioner to pass a proper appealable order after hearing the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33487</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>