<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (8) TMI 27 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441048</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, finding errors in the addition made under Section 56(2)(vii)(b)(ii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. It concluded that the Assessing Officer and Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) failed to consider valid documents and proper valuation dates. The Tribunal deemed the additional ground as academic and not adjudicated upon. Consequently, all appeals by the assessee(s) were allowed based on discrepancies in valuation and property transactions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2023 13:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=721168" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (8) TMI 27 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441048</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, finding errors in the addition made under Section 56(2)(vii)(b)(ii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. It concluded that the Assessing Officer and Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) failed to consider valid documents and proper valuation dates. The Tribunal deemed the additional ground as academic and not adjudicated upon. Consequently, all appeals by the assessee(s) were allowed based on discrepancies in valuation and property transactions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441048</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>