<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (8) TMI 6 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441027</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the contempt petition regarding breach of court order and priority of dues between a secured creditor and the State Government under sales tax laws. The notices demanding payment of sales tax dues from the secured creditor were not deemed intentional disobedience of the court order. The Court criticized the petitioners for filing the contempt petition, stating it was misconceived and not bona fide, as they were not directly involved in the initial court order. No costs were awarded in this matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2023 08:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=721138" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (8) TMI 6 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441027</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the contempt petition regarding breach of court order and priority of dues between a secured creditor and the State Government under sales tax laws. The notices demanding payment of sales tax dues from the secured creditor were not deemed intentional disobedience of the court order. The Court criticized the petitioners for filing the contempt petition, stating it was misconceived and not bona fide, as they were not directly involved in the initial court order. No costs were awarded in this matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441027</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>