https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441023 The High Court dismissed the appellant's second appeal challenging the dismissal of his suit to set aside a sale deed and declare ownership of the property. The court found no substantial questions of law were initially formulated and later held that the Benami Transactions Act does not apply retrospectively, upholding the defense taken in 1982. Additionally, the court ruled that permission under the Guardianship Act was not required as the property in question was not owned by the appellant. en-us Thu, 13 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 31 Jul 2023 11:44:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441023 The High Court dismissed the appellant's second appeal challenging the dismissal of his suit to set aside a sale deed and declare ownership of the property. The court found no substantial questions of law were initially formulated and later held that the Benami Transactions Act does not apply retrospectively, upholding the defense taken in 1982. Additionally, the court ruled that permission under the Guardianship Act was not required as the property in question was not owned by the appellant. Case-Laws Benami Property Thu, 13 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441023