<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (9) TMI 902 - THE SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308905</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that the appeal was maintainable as the Appellant was considered a &quot;person aggrieved&quot; by SEBI&#039;s order, allowing them to appeal under section 15T of the SEBI Act. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of protecting investors&#039; interests and ensuring that appeal provisions are accessible to affected investors. The Registry was instructed to expedite the disposal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2023 14:54:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=721103" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (9) TMI 902 - THE SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308905</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that the appeal was maintainable as the Appellant was considered a &quot;person aggrieved&quot; by SEBI&#039;s order, allowing them to appeal under section 15T of the SEBI Act. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of protecting investors&#039; interests and ensuring that appeal provisions are accessible to affected investors. The Registry was instructed to expedite the disposal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>SEBI</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308905</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>