https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308904 The court discharged the rule for contempt of court for disobedience of injunction, as there was no evidence of aiding and abetting the breach by the opposite party. The court emphasized that execution against the opposite party should be pursued in the lower court, and the rule for contempt was discharged without costs. Justice Narayan and Chief Justice Agarwala concurred with the decision, highlighting the importance of following legal procedures for execution remedies and the limited scope of contempt proceedings in cases of disobedience of injunctions. en-us Fri, 05 Mar 1948 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 31 Jul 2023 14:40:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308904 The court discharged the rule for contempt of court for disobedience of injunction, as there was no evidence of aiding and abetting the breach by the opposite party. The court emphasized that execution against the opposite party should be pursued in the lower court, and the rule for contempt was discharged without costs. Justice Narayan and Chief Justice Agarwala concurred with the decision, highlighting the importance of following legal procedures for execution remedies and the limited scope of contempt proceedings in cases of disobedience of injunctions. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 05 Mar 1948 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308904