<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (7) TMI 1284 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441011</link>
    <description>The HC ruled in favor of the Petitioner, determining compliance with Section 245D(2D) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Order dated 11th January, 2008, which declared the abatement of the Petitioner&#039;s Settlement Applications, was quashed. The matter was directed to be reconsidered by the Interim Board for Settlement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2024 11:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=721079" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (7) TMI 1284 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441011</link>
      <description>The HC ruled in favor of the Petitioner, determining compliance with Section 245D(2D) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Order dated 11th January, 2008, which declared the abatement of the Petitioner&#039;s Settlement Applications, was quashed. The matter was directed to be reconsidered by the Interim Board for Settlement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441011</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>