<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (7) TMI 1280 - ITAT SURAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441007</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that the addition of Rs. 24,91,375/- as unexplained cash credit under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act was not justified as the amount had already been taxed as sales in the previous year. The rejection of the books of account without invoking Section 145 was deemed unwarranted. The Tribunal found merit in the assessee&#039;s arguments and deleted the addition, emphasizing the risk of double taxation if the amount was taxed again.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2023 06:53:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=721074" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (7) TMI 1280 - ITAT SURAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441007</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that the addition of Rs. 24,91,375/- as unexplained cash credit under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act was not justified as the amount had already been taxed as sales in the previous year. The rejection of the books of account without invoking Section 145 was deemed unwarranted. The Tribunal found merit in the assessee&#039;s arguments and deleted the addition, emphasizing the risk of double taxation if the amount was taxed again.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441007</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>