<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (7) TMI 1279 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441006</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Department&#039;s appeal due to a delay of 363 days in filing, rejecting the condonation request based on Circular No.23 of 2019. Additionally, the Tribunal upheld the deletion of the Long Term Capital Gain addition by the ld. CIT(A) as there was no evidence linking the assessee to tax evasion activities, emphasizing that the assessee could not be held responsible for acts of third parties without specific findings against the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2023 11:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=721073" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (7) TMI 1279 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441006</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Department&#039;s appeal due to a delay of 363 days in filing, rejecting the condonation request based on Circular No.23 of 2019. Additionally, the Tribunal upheld the deletion of the Long Term Capital Gain addition by the ld. CIT(A) as there was no evidence linking the assessee to tax evasion activities, emphasizing that the assessee could not be held responsible for acts of third parties without specific findings against the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441006</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>