<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (7) TMI 1276 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441003</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the Rs. 3,60,00,000/- addition made by the A.O. under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The ITAT determined that the assessee sufficiently proved the identity, capacity, and creditworthiness of the lender company, as well as the genuineness of the transaction, leading to the dismissal of the revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2023 06:53:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=721069" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (7) TMI 1276 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441003</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the Rs. 3,60,00,000/- addition made by the A.O. under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The ITAT determined that the assessee sufficiently proved the identity, capacity, and creditworthiness of the lender company, as well as the genuineness of the transaction, leading to the dismissal of the revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441003</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>