<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (8) TMI 267 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33473</link>
    <description>Sulphuric acid used first to manufacture phosphoric acid, and then ultimately cleared for fertilizer manufacture, was treated as satisfying the end-use condition in Notification No. 81/75 read with the 12-12-1986 clarification. The Court read the notification and clarification together and accepted that use through an intermediate product did not defeat the exemption where the final destination was fertilizer manufacture. On those facts, the exemption was held applicable and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72104" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (8) TMI 267 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33473</link>
      <description>Sulphuric acid used first to manufacture phosphoric acid, and then ultimately cleared for fertilizer manufacture, was treated as satisfying the end-use condition in Notification No. 81/75 read with the 12-12-1986 clarification. The Court read the notification and clarification together and accepted that use through an intermediate product did not defeat the exemption where the final destination was fertilizer manufacture. On those facts, the exemption was held applicable and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33473</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>