<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (7) TMI 1240 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440967</link>
    <description>Rejection of a declaration under SVLDRS on the ground that &quot;tax dues&quot; were not quantified on or before 30.06.2019 was held unsustainable. Interpreting s.125(1)(e) with the departmental circular dated 27.08.2019, the HC held that &quot;quantified&quot; includes written communication of duty liability admitted during inquiry. The record showed the declarant&#039;s written admission on 21.05.2019, corroborated by subsequent departmental communications and later adjudication reflecting the same quantified figure; hence the department&#039;s view that quantification was absent before the cut-off date was misconceived. The impugned rejection was quashed; the authorities were directed to accept the SVLDRS-1 declaration and close the matter, including the consequential OIO.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2025 17:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=721021" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (7) TMI 1240 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440967</link>
      <description>Rejection of a declaration under SVLDRS on the ground that &quot;tax dues&quot; were not quantified on or before 30.06.2019 was held unsustainable. Interpreting s.125(1)(e) with the departmental circular dated 27.08.2019, the HC held that &quot;quantified&quot; includes written communication of duty liability admitted during inquiry. The record showed the declarant&#039;s written admission on 21.05.2019, corroborated by subsequent departmental communications and later adjudication reflecting the same quantified figure; hence the department&#039;s view that quantification was absent before the cut-off date was misconceived. The impugned rejection was quashed; the authorities were directed to accept the SVLDRS-1 declaration and close the matter, including the consequential OIO.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440967</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>