https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308891 The court upheld the recovery of an amount from the petitioner's leave encashment, dismissing the petition challenging the deduction. The dispute arose from both spouses receiving house rent allowance while residing together, contrary to Government Orders allowing only one spouse to claim the allowance in such cases. The court found the recovery justified, emphasizing the petitioner's wife's employment with a Central Government enterprise and the applicability of relevant Government Orders. The court rejected claims of lack of opportunity to respond, concluding that the recovery was valid based on the Orders and factual situation. en-us Thu, 15 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 30 Jul 2023 19:41:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308891 The court upheld the recovery of an amount from the petitioner's leave encashment, dismissing the petition challenging the deduction. The dispute arose from both spouses receiving house rent allowance while residing together, contrary to Government Orders allowing only one spouse to claim the allowance in such cases. The court found the recovery justified, emphasizing the petitioner's wife's employment with a Central Government enterprise and the applicability of relevant Government Orders. The court rejected claims of lack of opportunity to respond, concluding that the recovery was valid based on the Orders and factual situation. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 15 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308891