https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308891 Where governing instructions restricted house rent allowance to one spouse when husband and wife resided in the same accommodation, recovery of excess allowance from retiral dues was upheld because both spouses drew the allowance for the same period and the spouse was employed in a public sector bank. The later communication relied on by the employee did not assist him, as it concerned government servants and preserved earlier cases. The challenge on denial of opportunity also failed because notice had been issued, a reply was submitted, and no prejudice was shown. The writ petition was dismissed and the impugned recovery and appellate order were sustained. en-us Thu, 15 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 30 Jul 2023 19:41:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308891 Where governing instructions restricted house rent allowance to one spouse when husband and wife resided in the same accommodation, recovery of excess allowance from retiral dues was upheld because both spouses drew the allowance for the same period and the spouse was employed in a public sector bank. The later communication relied on by the employee did not assist him, as it concerned government servants and preserved earlier cases. The challenge on denial of opportunity also failed because notice had been issued, a reply was submitted, and no prejudice was shown. The writ petition was dismissed and the impugned recovery and appellate order were sustained. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 15 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308891