<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 1424 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308899</link>
    <description>The Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, setting aside the order passed under Section 148A(d) and the notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court emphasized the importance of adhering to specified time limitations for issuing notices under the new regime and the necessity for clarity in tax assessments to prevent ambiguity and potential discrepancies in taxation matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 30 Jul 2023 11:22:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=720994" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 1424 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308899</link>
      <description>The Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, setting aside the order passed under Section 148A(d) and the notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court emphasized the importance of adhering to specified time limitations for issuing notices under the new regime and the necessity for clarity in tax assessments to prevent ambiguity and potential discrepancies in taxation matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308899</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>