<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (8) TMI 1413 - NATIONAL ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308881</link>
    <description>NAPA held that developer failed to pass on ITC benefits of Rs. 1,45,28,245/- to flat buyers in violation of Section 171 CGST Act, 2017. Authority ordered developer to refund profiteered amount with 18% interest from collection date. Penalty under Section 171(3A) not imposed as provision wasn&#039;t operational during violation period (01.07.2017-31.03.2019). NAPA directed DGAP to investigate other projects by same developer for potential profiteering violations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2025 16:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=720924" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (8) TMI 1413 - NATIONAL ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308881</link>
      <description>NAPA held that developer failed to pass on ITC benefits of Rs. 1,45,28,245/- to flat buyers in violation of Section 171 CGST Act, 2017. Authority ordered developer to refund profiteered amount with 18% interest from collection date. Penalty under Section 171(3A) not imposed as provision wasn&#039;t operational during violation period (01.07.2017-31.03.2019). NAPA directed DGAP to investigate other projects by same developer for potential profiteering violations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308881</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>