<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (7) TMI 1220 - COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440947</link>
    <description>The SC reviewed a case involving alleged profiteering by a respondent in construction projects. After DGAP investigation confirmed only one project (&#039;U-Faria&#039;) was executed, the Commission determined no additional profiteering occurred. The proceedings were dropped, finding Section 171 of CGST Act, 2017 inapplicable, and the case file was closed without cost.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2025 15:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=720912" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (7) TMI 1220 - COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440947</link>
      <description>The SC reviewed a case involving alleged profiteering by a respondent in construction projects. After DGAP investigation confirmed only one project (&#039;U-Faria&#039;) was executed, the Commission determined no additional profiteering occurred. The proceedings were dropped, finding Section 171 of CGST Act, 2017 inapplicable, and the case file was closed without cost.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440947</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>