https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440946 SC confirmed DGAP's investigation findings that the respondent (construction company) did not profiteer in projects beyond 'JKG Palm Court'. The court upheld the Competition Commission's decision to drop proceedings, determining no violation of Section 171 of CGST Act, 2017 occurred in other projects. The case was closed after verifying the company's single project status through RERA and tax authority checks. en-us Mon, 17 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 17 Apr 2025 15:58:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440946 SC confirmed DGAP's investigation findings that the respondent (construction company) did not profiteer in projects beyond 'JKG Palm Court'. The court upheld the Competition Commission's decision to drop proceedings, determining no violation of Section 171 of CGST Act, 2017 occurred in other projects. The case was closed after verifying the company's single project status through RERA and tax authority checks. Case-Laws GST Mon, 17 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440946