<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (7) TMI 1202 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440929</link>
    <description>Section 68 addition on share application money was deleted because the assessee produced income-tax returns, bank statements, confirmations and affidavits, while the revenue did not discredit the material, conduct meaningful enquiry or allow effective cross-examination of the adverse deponent. The burden shifted to the revenue once primary evidence on identity, creditworthiness and genuineness was furnished, and it was not discharged. Estimation of profit at 8% on gross receipts from finishing work was also deleted because the books of account were not rejected; income could not be estimated on an ad hoc basis without a legally sustainable rejection of the regular books. Interest was treated as consequential.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2023 12:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=720894" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (7) TMI 1202 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440929</link>
      <description>Section 68 addition on share application money was deleted because the assessee produced income-tax returns, bank statements, confirmations and affidavits, while the revenue did not discredit the material, conduct meaningful enquiry or allow effective cross-examination of the adverse deponent. The burden shifted to the revenue once primary evidence on identity, creditworthiness and genuineness was furnished, and it was not discharged. Estimation of profit at 8% on gross receipts from finishing work was also deleted because the books of account were not rejected; income could not be estimated on an ad hoc basis without a legally sustainable rejection of the regular books. Interest was treated as consequential.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440929</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>