<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (7) TMI 1191 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440918</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that the confiscated goods imported by the appellant were considered as baggage under the Customs Act. As a result, the appeal was deemed not maintainable before the Tribunal, and the appellant was directed to pursue an appeal with the Revisionary Authority if desired.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Jul 2023 08:09:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=720883" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (7) TMI 1191 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440918</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that the confiscated goods imported by the appellant were considered as baggage under the Customs Act. As a result, the appeal was deemed not maintainable before the Tribunal, and the appellant was directed to pursue an appeal with the Revisionary Authority if desired.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440918</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>