https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440914 The court granted the petitioner regular bail under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C., emphasizing the importance of protecting constitutional rights and stating that the gravity of the offense alone is not a ground to deny bail. The court noted that the twin conditions under Section 212(6) of the Companies Act did not automatically apply as the petitioner was not under arrest when he appeared before the Special Judge. The court highlighted that the severity of the allegations does not justify pre-trial incarceration and emphasized the petitioner's right to an expeditious trial. en-us Wed, 19 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 28 Jul 2023 21:08:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440914 The court granted the petitioner regular bail under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C., emphasizing the importance of protecting constitutional rights and stating that the gravity of the offense alone is not a ground to deny bail. The court noted that the twin conditions under Section 212(6) of the Companies Act did not automatically apply as the petitioner was not under arrest when he appeared before the Special Judge. The court highlighted that the severity of the allegations does not justify pre-trial incarceration and emphasized the petitioner's right to an expeditious trial. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 19 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440914