<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (2) TMI 392 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33452</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal regarding the entitlement to a deduction on account of packing in the manufacture of Drillwell. Despite authorities&#039; disallowance due to lack of proof of packing return, the Tribunal accepted evidence of packing material return by customers, emphasizing that the deduction for returnable packing is permissible regardless of actual return. The appellant&#039;s clarification and evidence led to the overturning of the decision, highlighting the significance of understanding legal provisions on deductions and returnable packing in determining assessable value.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72083" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (2) TMI 392 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33452</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal regarding the entitlement to a deduction on account of packing in the manufacture of Drillwell. Despite authorities&#039; disallowance due to lack of proof of packing return, the Tribunal accepted evidence of packing material return by customers, emphasizing that the deduction for returnable packing is permissible regardless of actual return. The appellant&#039;s clarification and evidence led to the overturning of the decision, highlighting the significance of understanding legal provisions on deductions and returnable packing in determining assessable value.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33452</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>