https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308867 The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, ruling that the unregistered lease was unenforceable due to its duration exceeding one year, requiring registration under the Indian Registration Act. Section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act was deemed inapplicable for asserting rights under the unregistered lease. Additionally, the firm's claim for specific performance under Section 27 of the Specific Relief Act was rejected due to incomplete contractual formalities and lack of full possession of the property. Each party was ordered to bear their own appeal costs. en-us Mon, 08 Jan 1968 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 28 Jul 2023 13:00:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308867 The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, ruling that the unregistered lease was unenforceable due to its duration exceeding one year, requiring registration under the Indian Registration Act. Section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act was deemed inapplicable for asserting rights under the unregistered lease. Additionally, the firm's claim for specific performance under Section 27 of the Specific Relief Act was rejected due to incomplete contractual formalities and lack of full possession of the property. Each party was ordered to bear their own appeal costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 08 Jan 1968 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308867