<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (7) TMI 336 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33451</link>
    <description>Amounts deposited pursuant to settlement directions were treated as interim deposits, not final duty payments, so where no duty liability is ultimately sustained the amount is refundable with interest. The record was found insufficiently clear on the refund application date and the lower authorities had not properly examined the relevant circular and legal position, so a fresh decision was required. The matter was therefore remanded for reconsideration of the refund and interest claim in light of the settled principle governing interim deposits in tax proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72082" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (7) TMI 336 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33451</link>
      <description>Amounts deposited pursuant to settlement directions were treated as interim deposits, not final duty payments, so where no duty liability is ultimately sustained the amount is refundable with interest. The record was found insufficiently clear on the refund application date and the lower authorities had not properly examined the relevant circular and legal position, so a fresh decision was required. The matter was therefore remanded for reconsideration of the refund and interest claim in light of the settled principle governing interim deposits in tax proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33451</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>