<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (8) TMI 260 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33450</link>
    <description>Where common inputs are used in the manufacture of both dutiable and exempted goods and separate accounts are not maintained, reversal under the Cenvat Credit Rules is mandatory. The Tribunal treated the relevant common inputs as the chemicals used across the factory, not molasses as an intermediate product, and found the exempted final product was made with those common inputs. As no separate accounting was maintained, the condition for reversal under Rule 6 was attracted. The demand for reversal was therefore sustained, and the duty, interest and penalty confirmed in the impugned order were upheld against the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72081" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (8) TMI 260 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33450</link>
      <description>Where common inputs are used in the manufacture of both dutiable and exempted goods and separate accounts are not maintained, reversal under the Cenvat Credit Rules is mandatory. The Tribunal treated the relevant common inputs as the chemicals used across the factory, not molasses as an intermediate product, and found the exempted final product was made with those common inputs. As no separate accounting was maintained, the condition for reversal under Rule 6 was attracted. The demand for reversal was therefore sustained, and the duty, interest and penalty confirmed in the impugned order were upheld against the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33450</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>