<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 2098 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308854</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the decisions of the trial court and the High Court, affirming the dismissal of the application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC seeking rejection of the plaint. The court emphasized that issues like res judicata and Order II Rule 2 CPC involve mixed questions of law and fact, requiring evidence and cannot be decided at the preliminary stage. The appeal was dismissed, with the suggestion that issues related to the maintainability of the suit should be addressed first to avoid prolonged proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2023 09:23:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=720808" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 2098 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308854</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the decisions of the trial court and the High Court, affirming the dismissal of the application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC seeking rejection of the plaint. The court emphasized that issues like res judicata and Order II Rule 2 CPC involve mixed questions of law and fact, requiring evidence and cannot be decided at the preliminary stage. The appeal was dismissed, with the suggestion that issues related to the maintainability of the suit should be addressed first to avoid prolonged proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308854</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>