<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 1381 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308853</link>
    <description>The Cr. O.P. was allowed, resulting in the quashing of S.T.C. No. 422 of 2016 by the JM No. II, Salem. The court determined that the case was barred by limitation, as the second cheque presentation was solely to extend the limitation period. Consequently, related Cr. Misc. Petitions were also closed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2024 17:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=720807" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 1381 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308853</link>
      <description>The Cr. O.P. was allowed, resulting in the quashing of S.T.C. No. 422 of 2016 by the JM No. II, Salem. The court determined that the case was barred by limitation, as the second cheque presentation was solely to extend the limitation period. Consequently, related Cr. Misc. Petitions were also closed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308853</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>