<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 2149 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308852</link>
    <description>A plaint can be rejected at the threshold under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC where, on a meaningful reading, it is barred by limitation and discloses no pleaded factual to save time. Section 3 of the Limitation Act requires the court to dismiss a suit instituted beyond limitation even without a defence being raised. Where the plaint itself shows that the challenge is directed against an old transaction and contains no averment on date of knowledge or any basis for a later accrual of cause of action, summons need not be issued before considering limitation. The appeal failed and the dismissal of the suit with costs was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2023 09:23:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=720806" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 2149 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308852</link>
      <description>A plaint can be rejected at the threshold under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC where, on a meaningful reading, it is barred by limitation and discloses no pleaded factual to save time. Section 3 of the Limitation Act requires the court to dismiss a suit instituted beyond limitation even without a defence being raised. Where the plaint itself shows that the challenge is directed against an old transaction and contains no averment on date of knowledge or any basis for a later accrual of cause of action, summons need not be issued before considering limitation. The appeal failed and the dismissal of the suit with costs was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308852</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>