https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308851 The Trial Court affirmed the family settlement dated 28th March 1993, declaring the Plaintiff as the absolute owner of the Chandigarh property and granting a permanent injunction against Defendants 1 and 2. The Court rejected Defendant Nos. 1 and 2's claim for rendition of accounts. The Appeal Court upheld the Trial Court's decision, emphasizing the validity and binding nature of the family settlement over the earlier Will of 1986. The appeal was dismissed, with costs awarded to the Plaintiff to be paid within four weeks. en-us Fri, 09 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 28 Jul 2023 09:23:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308851 The Trial Court affirmed the family settlement dated 28th March 1993, declaring the Plaintiff as the absolute owner of the Chandigarh property and granting a permanent injunction against Defendants 1 and 2. The Court rejected Defendant Nos. 1 and 2's claim for rendition of accounts. The Appeal Court upheld the Trial Court's decision, emphasizing the validity and binding nature of the family settlement over the earlier Will of 1986. The appeal was dismissed, with costs awarded to the Plaintiff to be paid within four weeks. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 09 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308851