<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 2097 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308851</link>
    <description>A bona fide family settlement, once proved by signatures and original record and acted upon through mutation and conduct, remains enforceable despite being unregistered. The court rejected the objection based on Section 49 of the Registration Act because the arrangement had already been relied on by the parties, and a party who accepted benefits under it was estopped from later challenging it on technical grounds. The settlement allocating family property between the branches was therefore treated as binding, and the challenge to it failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2023 09:23:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=720805" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 2097 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308851</link>
      <description>A bona fide family settlement, once proved by signatures and original record and acted upon through mutation and conduct, remains enforceable despite being unregistered. The court rejected the objection based on Section 49 of the Registration Act because the arrangement had already been relied on by the parties, and a party who accepted benefits under it was estopped from later challenging it on technical grounds. The settlement allocating family property between the branches was therefore treated as binding, and the challenge to it failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308851</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>