https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308858 The court granted bail to the petitioner under section 439 of the Cr.P.C. in a case involving allegations under section 447 of the Companies Act. The petitioner's role was compared to a co-accused previously granted bail, emphasizing a peripheral involvement. The court considered the necessity of judicial custody, flight risk assessment, and imposed specific conditions for bail, including surrendering the passport and refraining from contacting witnesses. The order clarified it did not reflect on the case's merits and directed it to the Jail Superintendent, disposing of pending applications. en-us Mon, 06 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 28 Jul 2023 09:23:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308858 The court granted bail to the petitioner under section 439 of the Cr.P.C. in a case involving allegations under section 447 of the Companies Act. The petitioner's role was compared to a co-accused previously granted bail, emphasizing a peripheral involvement. The court considered the necessity of judicial custody, flight risk assessment, and imposed specific conditions for bail, including surrendering the passport and refraining from contacting witnesses. The order clarified it did not reflect on the case's merits and directed it to the Jail Superintendent, disposing of pending applications. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 06 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308858