https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33449 The Tribunal allowed the Revenue's appeals in a case involving clandestine removal of goods and penalties imposed on the respondents. The Tribunal found discrepancies between private records and statutory records, confirming the Director's involvement through hand-writing expert opinion. The Tribunal set aside the previous order, stating further investigation by the Revenue was necessary. The lack of evidence supporting the Director's claim of bias in the expert report led to the Tribunal's decision in favor of the Revenue, reinstating the Adjudicating authority's decision. en-us Thu, 14 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 15 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33449 The Tribunal allowed the Revenue's appeals in a case involving clandestine removal of goods and penalties imposed on the respondents. The Tribunal found discrepancies between private records and statutory records, confirming the Director's involvement through hand-writing expert opinion. The Tribunal set aside the previous order, stating further investigation by the Revenue was necessary. The lack of evidence supporting the Director's claim of bias in the expert report led to the Tribunal's decision in favor of the Revenue, reinstating the Adjudicating authority's decision. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 14 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33449