<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (7) TMI 1132 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440859</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the revocation of permission and penalty imposed under Section 117 of the Customs Act, 1962. It was determined that the appellant had followed all necessary procedures and permissions for exporting masks to the Philippines Government for COVID-19 relief efforts. The Tribunal concluded that the goods were considered ship stores, making the DGFT Notification regarding prohibited goods irrelevant in this case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2026 17:21:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=720761" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (7) TMI 1132 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440859</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the revocation of permission and penalty imposed under Section 117 of the Customs Act, 1962. It was determined that the appellant had followed all necessary procedures and permissions for exporting masks to the Philippines Government for COVID-19 relief efforts. The Tribunal concluded that the goods were considered ship stores, making the DGFT Notification regarding prohibited goods irrelevant in this case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440859</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>