https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440852 The Petitioner challenged the Appellate Tribunal's order under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, claiming lack of fair opportunity. The Court found in favor of the Petitioner, setting aside the impugned order and directing the Respondent to refund Rs. 1,48,000 seized in 1988, with 6% interest per annum. The Court ruled the Petitioner was deprived of his money without legal authority, allowing the Writ Petition and making the rule absolute. en-us Fri, 21 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 28 Jul 2023 09:20:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440852 The Petitioner challenged the Appellate Tribunal's order under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, claiming lack of fair opportunity. The Court found in favor of the Petitioner, setting aside the impugned order and directing the Respondent to refund Rs. 1,48,000 seized in 1988, with 6% interest per annum. The Court ruled the Petitioner was deprived of his money without legal authority, allowing the Writ Petition and making the rule absolute. Case-Laws FEMA Fri, 21 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440852