<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (7) TMI 1112 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440839</link>
    <description>Reliance on witness statements without granting cross-examination, and without a reasoned order on the request for cross-examination, was treated as a breach of natural justice. The Tribunal noted that the adjudication order materially depended on those statements, and that the statutory procedure under Section 9D had not been followed. Because the defect went to the root of the adjudication, the proper course was to set aside the order and remand the matter for fresh consideration after allowing cross-examination of the identified witnesses.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2023 09:19:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=720741" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (7) TMI 1112 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440839</link>
      <description>Reliance on witness statements without granting cross-examination, and without a reasoned order on the request for cross-examination, was treated as a breach of natural justice. The Tribunal noted that the adjudication order materially depended on those statements, and that the statutory procedure under Section 9D had not been followed. Because the defect went to the root of the adjudication, the proper course was to set aside the order and remand the matter for fresh consideration after allowing cross-examination of the identified witnesses.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440839</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>