<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (7) TMI 334 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33442</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI remitted the case back to the Adjudicating Authority due to legal infirmity and violation of natural justice in the first appellate order. The appellant was not afforded the opportunity to rebut, leading to concerns about fairness and due process. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of natural justice, ensuring both parties have a chance to present their case. The matter revolved around the leviability of Special Excise Duty, with the Tribunal stressing the principle of not condemning without a fair hearing. The decision aimed to rectify the lack of due process and provide a just resolution for both parties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 13:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72074" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (7) TMI 334 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33442</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI remitted the case back to the Adjudicating Authority due to legal infirmity and violation of natural justice in the first appellate order. The appellant was not afforded the opportunity to rebut, leading to concerns about fairness and due process. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of natural justice, ensuring both parties have a chance to present their case. The matter revolved around the leviability of Special Excise Duty, with the Tribunal stressing the principle of not condemning without a fair hearing. The decision aimed to rectify the lack of due process and provide a just resolution for both parties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33442</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>