<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (7) TMI 1107 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440834</link>
    <description>The court allowed the revisional application, quashing the proceedings under Section 138/141 of the Negotiable Instrument Act against the petitioner, who was a company secretary and non-signatory to the cheque. The trial against other accused persons would continue as per the law. No costs were awarded, and all related applications were resolved. Any interim orders were lifted, and the judgment was to be forwarded to the Trial Court for action.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2023 09:18:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=720736" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (7) TMI 1107 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440834</link>
      <description>The court allowed the revisional application, quashing the proceedings under Section 138/141 of the Negotiable Instrument Act against the petitioner, who was a company secretary and non-signatory to the cheque. The trial against other accused persons would continue as per the law. No costs were awarded, and all related applications were resolved. Any interim orders were lifted, and the judgment was to be forwarded to the Trial Court for action.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440834</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>