https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440832 The court upheld the legality of the summoning order under Section 202 Cr.P.C., finding no irregularity in the issuance of summons. It confirmed the territorial jurisdiction of the Delhi courts based on the location of the bank where the cheque was dishonored. Regarding the petitioners' resignation from the accused firm before the cheque issuance, discrepancies in presented documents led the court to deem the issue triable during the trial, emphasizing the need for detailed examination. The court dismissed the petition, stating that its observations were limited to the petition's decision and would not impact the trial's merits. en-us Tue, 04 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 27 Jul 2023 17:33:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440832 The court upheld the legality of the summoning order under Section 202 Cr.P.C., finding no irregularity in the issuance of summons. It confirmed the territorial jurisdiction of the Delhi courts based on the location of the bank where the cheque was dishonored. Regarding the petitioners' resignation from the accused firm before the cheque issuance, discrepancies in presented documents led the court to deem the issue triable during the trial, emphasizing the need for detailed examination. The court dismissed the petition, stating that its observations were limited to the petition's decision and would not impact the trial's merits. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 04 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440832