https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308849 The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, holding that she is the rightful owner of the property in question. The defendant's claim of benami ownership, alleging that the property was acquired using funds from a partnership firm, was rejected due to lack of sufficient evidence. Additionally, the defendant's assertion of being a tenant was dismissed as contradictory and unsupported. The court granted a permanent injunction in favor of the plaintiff, prohibiting the defendants from parting with possession of the property and issued a mandatory injunction for the defendants to vacate the premises. en-us Wed, 27 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 27 Jul 2023 17:01:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308849 The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, holding that she is the rightful owner of the property in question. The defendant's claim of benami ownership, alleging that the property was acquired using funds from a partnership firm, was rejected due to lack of sufficient evidence. Additionally, the defendant's assertion of being a tenant was dismissed as contradictory and unsupported. The court granted a permanent injunction in favor of the plaintiff, prohibiting the defendants from parting with possession of the property and issued a mandatory injunction for the defendants to vacate the premises. Case-Laws Benami Property Wed, 27 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308849