https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308848 A benami plea against property standing in the name of a female Hindu must be specifically pleaded by alleging that the purchase was not for her benefit; absent that essential averment, the partition claim is liable to rejection under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC. The Gurgaon property could not sustain the suit before that Court once the Delhi property claim failed, because the property lay outside territorial jurisdiction. No partition could also be sought in respect of shares and debentures standing in the mother's name during her lifetime. The plaint was therefore rejected as no relief remained legally maintainable before the Court. en-us Thu, 07 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 27 Jul 2023 16:45:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308848 A benami plea against property standing in the name of a female Hindu must be specifically pleaded by alleging that the purchase was not for her benefit; absent that essential averment, the partition claim is liable to rejection under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC. The Gurgaon property could not sustain the suit before that Court once the Delhi property claim failed, because the property lay outside territorial jurisdiction. No partition could also be sought in respect of shares and debentures standing in the mother's name during her lifetime. The plaint was therefore rejected as no relief remained legally maintainable before the Court. Case-Laws Benami Property Thu, 07 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308848