https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308846 The court held that the property was not ancestral and dismissed the suit due to failure to establish ancestral nature and limitation under Article 58 of the Limitation Act. The plaintiff was not entitled to a decree of partition as the property was self-acquired and validly gifted. The challenge to the Gift Deed and Sale Deed was barred by limitation, and the plaintiff's claim for an injunction was dismissed. The plaintiff had no locus standi, and the alleged settlement and Will were inadmissible. Ultimately, the plaintiff was not entitled to any relief, and the appeal was dismissed with costs in favor of the respondents. en-us Fri, 18 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 27 Jul 2023 16:18:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308846 The court held that the property was not ancestral and dismissed the suit due to failure to establish ancestral nature and limitation under Article 58 of the Limitation Act. The plaintiff was not entitled to a decree of partition as the property was self-acquired and validly gifted. The challenge to the Gift Deed and Sale Deed was barred by limitation, and the plaintiff's claim for an injunction was dismissed. The plaintiff had no locus standi, and the alleged settlement and Will were inadmissible. Ultimately, the plaintiff was not entitled to any relief, and the appeal was dismissed with costs in favor of the respondents. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 18 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308846