https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308845 The appeal was dismissed, affirming the amendments to the plaint for dissolution and accounts of the partnership, not for land. The court found the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act inapplicable, emphasizing that the suit's nature remained unchanged. The court upheld its jurisdiction, rejecting the appellant's arguments. Additionally, the application for a receiver's appointment was to be determined by the trial court. Costs of 700 Gms were awarded to be paid within a fortnight of receiving the judgment. en-us Wed, 03 Jun 1992 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 27 Jul 2023 15:53:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308845 The appeal was dismissed, affirming the amendments to the plaint for dissolution and accounts of the partnership, not for land. The court found the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act inapplicable, emphasizing that the suit's nature remained unchanged. The court upheld its jurisdiction, rejecting the appellant's arguments. Additionally, the application for a receiver's appointment was to be determined by the trial court. Costs of 700 Gms were awarded to be paid within a fortnight of receiving the judgment. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 03 Jun 1992 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308845