https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308844 Under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC, a plaint can be rejected only if the suit is barred by law on the face of the plaint itself. The SC held that limitation must be examined on a meaningful reading of the plaint as a whole, not by isolating selected passages, and that averments showing date of knowledge or other relevant facts cannot be ignored. Where the pleaded facts make limitation a disputable issue dependent on evidence, threshold rejection is not justified. The rejection order was therefore unsustainable, the suit was restored, and limitation was left open for determination in accordance with law. en-us Wed, 03 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 28 Jul 2023 12:54:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308844 Under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC, a plaint can be rejected only if the suit is barred by law on the face of the plaint itself. The SC held that limitation must be examined on a meaningful reading of the plaint as a whole, not by isolating selected passages, and that averments showing date of knowledge or other relevant facts cannot be ignored. Where the pleaded facts make limitation a disputable issue dependent on evidence, threshold rejection is not justified. The rejection order was therefore unsustainable, the suit was restored, and limitation was left open for determination in accordance with law. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 03 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308844