<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (10) TMI 715 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308844</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court set aside the trial court and High Court&#039;s decisions, directing the trial court to restore and decide the suit on its merits within six months. The Court emphasized that the issue of limitation should be decided after a full examination of the evidence on record and that the entire plaint should be considered as a whole, not in isolated parts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2023 12:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=720704" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (10) TMI 715 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308844</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court set aside the trial court and High Court&#039;s decisions, directing the trial court to restore and decide the suit on its merits within six months. The Court emphasized that the issue of limitation should be decided after a full examination of the evidence on record and that the entire plaint should be considered as a whole, not in isolated parts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308844</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>