<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (7) TMI 1104 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440831</link>
    <description>SC allowed appeal challenging bail condition of depositing Rs.1.5 crores, finding it unsustainable. The court set aside the specific financial deposit requirement while maintaining other bail conditions. Both appellant&#039;s counsel and ASG agreed the monetary condition was inappropriate given the nature of the GST-related case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2025 11:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=720658" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (7) TMI 1104 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440831</link>
      <description>SC allowed appeal challenging bail condition of depositing Rs.1.5 crores, finding it unsustainable. The court set aside the specific financial deposit requirement while maintaining other bail conditions. Both appellant&#039;s counsel and ASG agreed the monetary condition was inappropriate given the nature of the GST-related case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440831</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>