https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440827 The Calcutta HC held that a writ petition was not maintainable where an efficacious alternate remedy of statutory appeal was available. The court found that the adjudicating authority had considered facts and provided reasoning, though the appellant disputed the decision. Since disputed questions of fact were involved requiring re-appreciation of evidence, the HC directed the appellant to file a statutory appeal rather than pursue writ proceedings. The appellate authority was instructed to consider the appeal on both facts and law, provide personal hearing opportunity, and render a reasoned decision on merits. en-us Fri, 21 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 17 Apr 2025 15:46:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440827 The Calcutta HC held that a writ petition was not maintainable where an efficacious alternate remedy of statutory appeal was available. The court found that the adjudicating authority had considered facts and provided reasoning, though the appellant disputed the decision. Since disputed questions of fact were involved requiring re-appreciation of evidence, the HC directed the appellant to file a statutory appeal rather than pursue writ proceedings. The appellate authority was instructed to consider the appeal on both facts and law, provide personal hearing opportunity, and render a reasoned decision on merits. Case-Laws GST Fri, 21 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440827