<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (7) TMI 1057 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440784</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the Criminal Original Petitions after clarifying that the petitioner misunderstood the order under Section 148, not 143A, of the NI Act. The Court held that the condition to deposit 20% was valid at the appellate stage and found no merit in the petitioner&#039;s arguments, ultimately upholding the suspension of sentence with the deposit requirement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2023 21:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=720611" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (7) TMI 1057 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440784</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the Criminal Original Petitions after clarifying that the petitioner misunderstood the order under Section 148, not 143A, of the NI Act. The Court held that the condition to deposit 20% was valid at the appellate stage and found no merit in the petitioner&#039;s arguments, ultimately upholding the suspension of sentence with the deposit requirement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440784</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>